PROSPECTS FOR A PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSING CYP2D6 ACTIVITY USING PINOLINE

DOI: https://doi.org/None
Issue: 
5
Year: 
2015

R.Kh. Abdrashitov, G.N. Gildeeva, PhD; Professor G.V. Ramenskaya, PhD; V.V. Smirnov, PhD I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; 8, Trubetskaya St., Build. 2, Moscow 119991

Cytochrome P450 isoenzymes are involved in the biotransformation of different endogenous an exogenous substances, including medications. The paper considers the specific features of the functioning and polymorphism of the cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme CYP2D6 and the possible consequences of its malfunction influenced by genetic factors and inhibitors or inducers. It also deals with the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of existing procedures for determining its activity with exogenous markers. Screening studies of endogenous substrates that are prone to biotransformation that is predominantly affected by the isoenzyme CYP2D6 are reviewed. The compounds indole methylamine, 5-methoxy-N,Ndimethyltryptamine (5-MDMT) and pinoline (6-methoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-β-carboline) had the greatest affinity for CYP2D6. The specificity of pinoline was about 99%. The paper covers the results of investigations dealing with the relationship of pinoline to its metabolite 6-hydroxy-1,2,3,4tetrahydro-β-carboline in vitro on cell culture and in vivo in mice for further assessment of CYP2D6 activity.

Keywords: 
biotransformation
phenotyping
CYP2D6
cytochrome P450
pinoline
personalized medicine

References: 
  1. Sheridan R.P., Korzekwa K.R., Torres R.A., Walker M.J. Empirical regioselectivity models for human cytochromes P450 3A4, 2D6, and 2C9. J. Med. Chem., 2007; 50 (14): 3173–3184.
  2. Smirnov V.V., Savchenko A.Yu., Ramenskaya G.V. Razrabotka i validaciya metodiki kolichestvennogo opredeleniya e`ndogennogo kortizola i 6-β-gidroksikortizola v moche s cel`yu opredeleniya aktivnosti izofermenta CYP 3A4. Biomedicina, 2010; 4: 56–60 [Smirnov V.V., SavchenkoA.Ju., Ramenskaja G.V. Development and validation of methods of quantitative determination of endogenous cortisol and 6-β-hydrocortisol in the urine with the aim ofdetermine the activity of CYP 3A4 isoenzyme. Biomedicina, 2010; 4: 56–60 (in Russian)].
  3. Terfloth L., Bienfait B., GasteigerJ. Ligand - based models for the isoform specificity of cytochrome P450 3A4, 2D6, and 2C9 substrates. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2007; 47: 1688–1701.
  4. Guengerich F.P., Miller G.P., Hanna I.H., Martin M.V., Leger S., Black C., Chauret N., Silva J.M., Trimble L.A., Yergey J.A., Nicoll - Griffith D.A. Diversity in the oxidation of substrates by cytochrome P450 2D6: lack of an obligatory role of aspartate 301 – substrate electrostatic bonding. Biochemistry, 2002; 41: 11025–11034.
  5. Kukes V.G., Sychev D.A., Shih E.V. Izuchenie biotransformacii lekarstvennyh sredstv – put` k povysheniyu e`ffektivnosti i bezopasnosti farmakoterapii. Vrach, 2007; 1: 6–8 [Kukes V.G., Sychev D.A., Shih E.V. Study of the biotransformation of drugs - a way to increase the effectiveness and safety of pharmacotherapy. Vrach, 2007; 1: 6–8 (in Russian)].
  6. Kukes V.G. Metabolizm lekarstvennyh sredstv: kliniko-farmakologicheskie aspekty. M.: Reafarm, 2004; 144 [Kukes V.G. Drug metabolism: clinical and pharmacological aspects. Moscow: Reafarm, 2004; 144 (in Russian)].
  7. Griese E.U., Zanger U.M., Brudermanns U., Gaedigk A., Mikus G.,Morike K., Stuven T., Eichelbaum M.Assessment of the predictive power of genotypes for the in-vivo catalytic function of CYP2D6 in a German population. Pharmacogenetics, 1998; 8: 15–26.
  8. Pedersen R.S., Damkier P., Brosen K. Tramadol as a new probe for cytochrome P450 2D6 phenotyping: a population study. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 2005; 77: 458–467.
  9. Poulsen L., Arendt-Nielsen L., Brosen K., Sindrup S.H.The hypoalgesic effect of tramadol in relation to CYP2D6. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 1996; 60: 636–644.
  10. Subrahmanyam V., Renwick A.B., Walters D.G., Young P.J., Price R.J., Tonelli A.P., Lake B.G. Identification of cytochrome P-450 isoforms responsible for cis-tramadol metabolism in human liver microsomes. Drug Metab.Dispos., 2001; 29; 1146–1155.
  11. Kim M., Shen D.D., Eddy A.C., Nelson W.L., Roskos L.K. Inhibition of the enantio selective oxidative metabolism of metoprolol by verapamil in human liver microsomes. Drug Metab.Dispos., 1993; 21: 309–317.
  12. Labbe L., Sirois C., Pilote S., Arseneault M., Robitaille N.M.,Turgeon J., Hamelin B.A. Effect of gender, sex hormones, time variables and physiological urinary pH on apparent CYP2D6 activity as assessed by metabolic ratios of marker substrates. Pharmacogenetics, 2000; 10:.425–438.
  13. Cerqueira P.M., Coelho E.B., Geleilete T.J., Goldman G.H., Lanchote V.L. Influence of chronic renal failure on stereo selective metoprolol metabolism in hypertensive patients. Clin. Pharmacol., 2005; 45: 1422–1433.
  14. Tegeder I., Lotsch J., Geisslinger G. Pharmacokinetics of opioids in liver disease. Clin. Pharmacokinet., 1999; 37: 17–40.
  15. Von Moltke L.L., Greenblatt D.J., Grassi J.M., Granda B.W., Venkatakrishnan K., Schmider J., Harmatz J.S., Shader R.I. Multiple human cytochromes contribute to biotransformation ofdextromethorphan in-vitro: role of CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 1998; 50: 997–1004.
  16. Chainuvati S., Nafziger A.N., Leeder J.S., Gaedigk A., Kearns G.L., Sellers E., Zhang Y., Kashuba A.D., Rowland E., Bertino J.S. Combined phenotypic assessment of cytochrome P4501A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A, N-acetyltransferase-2, andxanthine oxidase activities with the «Cooperstown 5+1 cocktail». Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 2003; 74: 437–447.
  17. Yu A. M., Idle J. R., Herraiz T., Kupfer A., Gonzalez F. J. Screening for endogenous substrates reveals that CYP2D6 is a 5-methoxyindolethylamine O-demethylase. Pharmacogenetics, 2003; 13: 307–319.
  18. Jiang X.L., Shen H.W., Yu A.M. Pinoline May be Used as a Probe for CYP2D6 Activity. Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 2013; 37 (3): 443–446.
  19. Zhang W.Y., Tu Y.B., Haining R.L., Yu A.M. Expression and functional analysis of CYP2D6.24, CYP2D6.26, CYP2D6.27 and CYP2D7 isozymes. Drug Metab. Dispos., 2009; 37: 1–4.