THE NECESSITY AND IMPORTANCE OF APPLYING GACP FOR CRUDE DRUGS IN RUSSIA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29296/25419218-2018-04-03
Issue: 
4
Year: 
2018

A.N. Tsitsilin All-Russian Research Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (VILAR), 7, Grin St., Moscow 117216, Russian Federation

The paper analyzes the current situation using GACP (Good Agricultural and Collection Practice for Medicinal Plants). Its considers its correlation with GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice) in obtaining medicinal plant raw material (MPRM) from cultivated and wild plants in Russia. It is shown that both primary producers of MPRM (the organizations that cultivate medicinal plants or store their raw materials in nature) and its sellers and processors should comply with the GACP rules. The widespread of GACP in the Russian Federation is constrained by a lack of the approved good practices for cultivation of medicinal plants and for procurement of their raw material in the nature of Russia, by the collapse of large-scale commercial farms, by the complexity and high cost of entering the international MPRM market, and by a rare mention of GACP in modern Russian scientific literature on the production of raw materials from medicinal plants.

Keywords: 
medicinal plants
medicinal plant raw materials
GACP
good practices for cultivation of medicinal plants and for procurement of their raw materials in nature

References: 
  1. WHO Guidelines on good agricultural and collection practice (GACP) for medicinal and aromatic plants. Geneva, 2003.
  2. Good Agricultural and Collection Practice for Herbal Raw Materials (Botanical Raw Materials Committee of the American Herbal Products Association, American Herbal Pharmacopoeia), 2006.
  3. Guidelines for good agricultural and collection practices for starting materials of herbal origin. EMEA. London: EMEA/HMPC/246816/2006 (20 February 2006).
  4. LІKARS`KІ ZASOBI. Nalezhna praktika kul`tivuvannya ta zbirannya vihіdnoї sirovini roslinnogo pohodzhennya./ST-N MOZU 42-4.5:2012 . Vidannya ofіcіyne. Kiїv. Mіnіsterstvo ohoroni zdorov'ya Ukraїni. 2012.
  5. Prikaz MZ Respubliki Belarus` № 88 ot 29.11.2012 «Proizvodstvo lekarstvennyh sredstv. Nadlezhashhaya praktika vyrashhivaniya, sbora, hraneniya lekarstvennogo rastitel`nogo syr`ya».
  6. GOST R 52249-2009 «Pravila proizvodstva i kontrolya kachestva lekarstvennyh sredstv», 20.05.2009.
  7. Markevich A.V. Chto takoe praktika nadlezhashhego vozdelyvaniya i zagotovki (GACP) dlya lekarstvennyh rasteniy i zachem ee neobhodimo vnedrit` v Rossii. Doklady TSHA. RGAU – MSHA im. K. A. Timiryazeva. 2011; 283 (1): 661–5.
  8. Prikaz Ministerstva promyshlennosti i torgovli RF № 916 «Pravila organizacii proizvodstva i kontrolya kachestva lekarstvennyh sredstv». Prilozhenie №7 (14 iyunya 2013 g.).
  9. Pravila sbora i sushki lekarstvennyh rasteniy (sbornik instrukciy). M.: Medicina, 1985; 328.
  10. Vinogradova Yu.K., Mayorov S.R., Horun L.V. Chyornaya kniga flory Sredney Rossii: chuzherodnye vidy rasteniy v e`kosistemah Sredney Rossii. M.: GEOS, 2010; 512.
  11. Atlas arealov i resursov lekarstvennyh rasteniy SSSR. M.: GUGK; 1980. 340.
  12. Posevnye ploshhadi Rossiyskoy Federacii v 2016 g. Valovye sbory i urozhaynost` sel`skohozyaystvennyh kul`tur po Rossiyskoy Federacii v 2016 godu. Chast` 1. Byulleteni o sostoyanii sel`skogo hozyaystva. Federal`naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki (ROSSTAT). Glavnyy mezhregional`nyy centr. [E`lektronnoe izdanie]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_1265196018516
  13. Malankina E.L., Cicilin A.N. Lekarstvennye i e`firnomaslichnye rasteniya. M.: INFRA-M, 2016; 368.