DIGITAL channels in the pharmaceutical promotion system in the Russian pharmaceutical market

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29296/25419218-2020-04-03
Issue: 
4
Year: 
2020

E.E. Chupandina(1), G.T. Glembotskaya(2), A.B. Goryachev(2), A.Yu. Rodivilova(1) 1-Voronezh State University; 1, Universtitetskaya Sq., Voronezh 394018, Russian Federation 2-I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); 8, Trubetskaya St., Build. 2, Moscow 119991, Russia

Introduction. The Internet takes leading positions in the ranking of information sources for physicians and pharmacy workers. This «dependence» of medical and pharmaceutical workers on the Internet creates new marketing opportunities for pharmaceutical companies. Digital marketing, a relatively new area, emerges in the pharmaceutical industry. Digital marketing is a powerful tool in informing medical and pharmaceutical workers about drugs, but it can also play a negative role when used for misinformation and misleading. Objective: to analyze the composition and contents of digital channels used to promote drugs in the Russian pharmaceutical market. Material and methods. The authors analyzed scientific publications and regulatory acts on the circulation of medicines, 13 specialized professional on-line resources, 50 websites of pharmaceutical manufacturers, 30 profiled specialized groups in the social networks, and 30 brand platforms. They used methods, such as content analysis, generalization, and systematization. Results. The authors compiled a list of 13 digital channels and described the features of using a certain category of digital promotion channels depending on the target audience and the degree of dispensing regulation. It was found that there were no clear and understandable mechanisms for verifying the information obtained through digital channels. This can contribute to irrational prescription and recommendation of drugs and increase treatment costs for patients or cause undesirable adverse reactions. Conclusion. During digital promotion, there is a risk of misinformation for ultimate drug users.

Keywords: 
medicines
pharmaceutical marketing
digital marketing
direct-to-consumer advertising
on-line drug promotion

References: 
  1. Chupandina E.E., Dagir S. Obzor osnovnyh podhodov i osobennostej v prodvizhenii lekarstvennyh preparatov na rossijskom rynke. Meditsina i obrazovanie v Sibiri. 2015; 5: 19. [Chupandina E.E., Dagir S. Review of the main approaches and features in promotion of medicines on the Russian market. Medicina i obrazovanie v Sibiri. 2015; 5: 19 (in Russian)].
  2. Sweet M. Pharmaceutical marketing and the internet. Australian Prescriber. 2009; 32: 2–4. DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2009.001
  3. Fickweiler F., Fickweiler W., Urbach E. Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry generally and sales representatives specifically and their association with physicians' attitudes and prescribing habits: a systematic review. B.M.J. Open. 2017; 7 (9): e016408. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016408
  4. Francer J., Izquierdo J.Z., Music T. et al. Ethical pharmaceutical promotion and communications worldwide: codes and regulations. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2014; 9: 7. DOI:10.1186/1747-5341-9-7
  5. Leonardo Alves T., Lexchin J., Mintzes B. Medicines information and the regulation of the promotion of pharmaceuticals. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2018; published online: 02 May. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-018-0041-5
  6. De Freitas J., Falls B.A., Haque O.S., Bursztajn H.J. Vulnerabilities to misinformation in online pharmaceutical marketing. J. R. Soc. Med. 2013;106 (5): 184–9. DOI:10.1177/0141076813476679
  7. Kwak E.S., Chang H. Medical Representatives' intention to use information technology in pharmaceutical marketing. Healthc Inform Res. 2016; 22 (4): 342–50. DOI:10.4258/hir.2016.22.4.342
  8. Jawaid M., Ahmed S.J. Pharmaceutical digital marketing and its impact on healthcare physicians of Pakistan: anational survey. Cureus. 2018; 10 (6): e2789. DOI:10.7759/cureus.2789
  9. Fel'dman O. Prodvizhenie lekarstvennyh sredstv: mul'tizaputannost' ili est' li vozmozhnost' dojti do suti? [Elektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://rafm.ru/sites/default/files/userfiles/materials/23%20%D0%BE%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%8F%D0%B1%D1%80%D1%8F%202018/23.10.2018_Ipsos%20Comcon.pdf. [Fel'dman O.Promotion ofdrugs: multi-confusion or is it possible to get to the bottom? [Elektronic resource]. Access mode: https://rafm.ru/sites/default/files/userfiles/materials/23%20%D0%BE%D0% BA%D1%82%D1%8F%D0%B1%D1%80%D1%8F%202018/23.10.2018_Ipsos%20Comcon.pdf (in Russian).
  10. Syrkiewicz-Świtała M., Romaniuk P., Ptak E. Perspectives for the use of social media in e-pharmamarketing. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2016; 7: 445. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00445
  11. Moorhead S.A., Hazlett D.E., Harrison L. et al. A new dimension of healthcare: systemic review of the uses, benefits and limitations of social media for health communication. J. Med. Internet. Res. 2013; 15: e85. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1933