Differences in the psychological characteristics of higher and secondary pharmacy education students

Download full text PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29296/25419218-2021-05-07
Issue: 
5
Year: 
2021

V.V. Bogdanov, K.G. Nozdrachev, A.S. Shoshin, E.Yu. Kuklin, V.S. Chavyr Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 1, Partisan Zheleznyak St., Krasnoyarsk 660022, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Russian Federation

Introduction. For a long time, the boundary between higher and secondary pharmacy education specialists has been increasingly blurred. The requirements for the positions and functions of higher and secondary education pharmacists are largely similar. However, there are differences in the level of education, acquired competencies, social and cultural environment, motivation, worldview, etc., the study of which can be the basis for optimizing personnel policy in both the training of pharmacy personnel and for managing the latter in pharmaceutical organizations Objective: to study differences in the psychological characteristics of students going into higher and secondary professional pharmacy education. Material and methods. The data from four questionnaires, such as Motivation questionnaire, the Shmishek-Leonhard characterological questionnaire, the Cattell questionnaire, and dynamic properties questionnaire (proposed by Rusalov) were taken to study 42 students in specialty 33.05.01 Pharmacy (higher education pharmacists) and 107 students in specialty 33.02.01 Pharmacy (secondary education pharmacists). The results of statistical data processing of questionnaire scores were studied using the Mann–Whitney U test in the IBM SPSS Statistics program. Results. The similarities and statistically significant differences were identified by 11 criteria for the psychological characteristics of higher and secondary pharmacy education students. Conclusion. The higher pharmacy education students are more oriented to theory, a systematic logical description of the world, more self-restrained, rational, and psychologically rigid, and also with their high intellectual activity, they have an average physical activity level. The secondary pharmacy education students are more oriented to relationships between people, are more emotionally and psychologically mobile, they are oriented to the norms of behavior of the group of people around them, to the activities according to the plan, they are pedantic in work, are more eager for physical activity, and have a high speed in manual labor.
Keywords: 
psychological profile
pharmaceutical personnel
pharmacy education
questionnaire
higher secondary pharmacists
secondary education pharmacists
Mann-Whitney U test
References: 
  1. Kareva N.N. Providing comfortable psychological condition – one of the internal directions of social responsibility of the pharmacy organization. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Meditsina. Farmatsiya. 2018; 41 (3): 502–11 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18413/2075-4728-2018-41-3-502-511
  2. Ivanova K.A., Ilinova J.G. Study of international experience in research of professional activity of pharmaceutical personnel in the context of restrictions, related to the development of the system of professional qualifications in the Russian Federation. Formuly Farmatsii. 2020; 2 (3): 24–9 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17816/phf35216
  3. Smolina V.A., Novokreshchenova I.G., Novokreshchenov I.V. Professional characteristics of a pharmaceutical specialist in chemist's. Saratovskii nauchno-meditsinskii zhurnal. 2020; 16 (4): 968–73 (in Russian).
  4. Meliksetyan A.A. Pharmaceutical education in Russia and the Bologna system. Innovatsii v zdorov'e natsii: sbornik materialov VI Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. Saint-Petersburg, 2018; 504–7 (in Russian).
  5. Kovalev D.N., Kulik V.V., Kovaleva T.G. Modern requirements for professional training of specialists with pharmaceutical education and the educational needs studying of drugstores workers. Sovremennaya nauka i innovatsii. 2014; 2 (6): 73–9 (in Russian).
  6. Nozdrachev K.G., Bogdanov V.V., Luneva L.A. et al. Analysis of differences in psychological profiles of graduates of medical and pharmaceutical specialties. Sovremennye problemy zdravookhraneniya i meditsinskoi statistiki. 2020; 4: 35–56 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24411/2312-2935-2020-00096
  7. Boldyreva N.V. Identification and talent management in the modern organization with the tools DISC and PIAV. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo. 2017; 11 (88): 566–73 (in Russian).
  8. Raigorodskii D.Ya. ed. Practical psychodiagnostics: Methods and tests. Samara: BAKhRAKh-M, 2002; 667 (in Russian).
  9. Berestneva O., Yasukevich J., Shpak J. The analysis of value orientations and psychological characteristics of students of economic specialties. Internet-zhurnal «Naukovedenie». 2013; 6 (19): 172 (in Russian).
  10. Soltanbekova B.A. Problems of differential diagnostics of accentuations of character at teenagers. Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya. 2015; 5 (54): 226–8 (in Russian).
  11. Kapustina A.N. R. Kettel's multifactorial personal methodology. Saint-Petersburg: Rech', 2006; 99 (in Russian).
  12. Poletaykin A., Il'ina T. Fuzzy assessment techniques of student's personality. ITportal. 2016; 4 (12): 2 (in Russian).
  13. Rusalov V.M. Questionnaire of formal-dynamic properties of individuality. Moscow: Izd-vo AO "Dialog-MGU", 1997; 50 (in Russian).
  14. Rusalov V., Manolova O. The self report questionnaire «Temperament-character». Vestnik Samarskoi gumanitarnoi akademii. Seriya: Psikhologiya. 2009; 1 (5): 165–78 (in Russian).
  15. Moiseeva O.Yu. Psychodiagnostics of individual personality traits. Part 1. Psychodiagnostics of temperament. Vladivostok: Morskoi gosudarstvennyi universitet. 2002; 52 (in Russian).
  16. Slesareva E.A., Zadokhina N.V. Criteria of statistical significance as an integral part of experimental psychology. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2017; 4: 254–8 (in Russian).
  17. Bordya T.D. Methodology for predicting the success of training of first-year students. Aktual'nye tendentsii i innovatsii v razvitii rossiiskoi nauki : sbornik nauchnykh statei. Moscow, 2019; 22–5 (in Russian).